Issue 3
Journal for Veterinary Medicine, Biotechnology and Biosafety
Volume
1, Issue 3, September 2015, Pages 20–26
ISSN 2411-3174 (print version) ISSN 2411-0388
(online version)
Brucellosis — the current
situation in Poland
Iwaniak
W., Szulowski K.
Department
of Microbiology, National Veterinary Research Institute, Pulawy, Poland, email:
iwaniakw@piwet.pulawy.pl
Download
PDF (print version)
Citation for
print version: Iwaniak, W. and
Szulowski, K. (2015) ‘Brucellosis — the current situation in Poland’,
Journal for Veterinary Medicine,
Biotechnology and Biosafety, 1(3), pp. 20–26.
Download
PDF (online version)
Citation for online version: Iwaniak, W. and Szulowski,
K. (2015) ‘Brucellosis — the current situation in Poland’, Journal for Veterinary Medicine, Biotechnology and
Biosafety. [Online] 1(3), pp. 20–26.
Available at:
http://jvmbbs.kharkov.ua/archive/2015/volume1/issue3/oJVMBBS_2015013_020-026.pdf
Summary. The
surveys of animals for brucellosis in Poland are primarily
based on serological tests. The examinations are
performed by regional laboratories using RBT. In the case of positive
results obtained in this test the samples are examined in SAT and CFT. The
definitive confirmatory investigations are conducted by the National Reference
Laboratory for Brucellosis in the Department of Microbiology of NVRI in Pulawy,
which additionally uses Coombs’ test, 2-Me test and ELISA. In the paper results
of the examination of cattle in Poland in the years
2005–2014 are shown. Each year during examination period 130–420
cows were involved in confirmatory investigations and 6–34 animals were classified as positive for brucellosis. In
bacteriological examinations of samples from seropositive cows, B. abortus has
never been isolated. Only in 2006 B. suis biovar
2 has been recovered from the bovine internal organs. B. melitensis has never been reported and according to the Commission
Decision from 2006, Poland has been regarded as ‘Brucellosis officially
free country’. At the moment, the aim of the
ongoing testing is to maintain the B. melitensis free country status.
Sheep and goats are tested using RBT. Samples reacting
positive in the RBT are retested in the National
Reference Laboratory for Brucellosis (NRL) using again RBT and CFT. Up to now all samples tested in NRL were finally regarded as
negative. Ovine epididymitis (B. ovis) has been also
reported in Poland. Diagnosis of the disease is based on the serological
examination by complement fixation test (CFT) using the antigen obtained from
the rough strain of B. ovis REO198. Similarly, examinations based on the
antigen obtained from B. canis are conducted in dogs (rapid slide
agglutination test – RSAT and slow agglutination test – SAT), but
brucellosis in this species of animals has never been confirmed in Poland.
Regarding the situation in porcine brucellosis, there were some outbreaks
several years ago and active monitoring of pigs is performed.
In general, positive results are mainly connected with false positive
serological reactions (FPSR) due to Y. enterocolitica O:9. There is no active monitoring of brucellosis in the
wildlife animals in Poland but samples are taken during the
hunting season and tested for scientific purposes. When testing 4407
samples of the wild boar sera, 1077 sera reacted positive in ELISA. Also research done on hare sera several years ago indicated
very similar percentage of the positives. These data show that the wildlife is
a huge reservoir of the Brucella and it could play a role in an
epidemiology of brucellosis also in domestic animals.
Keywords: Brucella, bovine brucellosis, porcine
brucellosis, wildlife, B. suis biovar 2
References:
Al Dahouk, S., Nockler,
K., Tomaso, H., Splettstoesser, W. D., Jungersen, G., Riber, U., Petry, T.,
Hoffmann, D., Scholz, H. C., Hensel, A. and Neubauer, H. (2005) ‘Seroprevalence
of brucellosis, tularemia, and yersiniosis in wild boars (Sus scrofa) from North-Eastern Germany’, Journal of
Veterinary Medicine Series B, 52(10), pp. 444–455. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0450.2005.00898.x
Alton, G. G., Jones, L.
M., Angus, R. D. and Verger, J. M. (1988) Techniques for the brucellosis
Laboratory. Paris, France: Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique. ISBN
273-800-042-8
Cvetnic,
Z., Mitak, M., Ocepek, M., Lojkic, M., Terzic, S., Jemersic, L., Humski, A.,
Habrun, B., Sostaric, B., Brstilo, M., Krt, B. and Garin-Bastuji, B. (2003) ‘Wild
boars (Sus scrofa) as reservoirs of Brucella suis biovar 2 in
Croatia’, Acta Veterinaria Hungarica, 51(4), pp. 465–473. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/avet.51.2003.4.4
Cvetnic,
Z., Toncic, J., Spicic, S., Lojkic, M., Terzic, S., Jemersic, L., Humski, A.,
Curic, S., Mitak, M., Habrun, B., Brstilo, M., Ocepek, M. and Krt, B. (2004) ‘Brucellosis
in wild boar (Sus scrofa) in the Republic of Croatia’, Veterinary
Medicine (Prague) [Veterinarni Medicina (Praha)], 49(4), pp. 115–122. Available at: http://vri.cz/docs/vetmed/49-4-115.pdf
EC. (2002) ‘Commission
Regulation (EC) No 535/2002 of 21 March 2002 amending Annex C to Council
Directive 64/432/EEC and amending Decision 2000/330/EC’, The Official
Journal of the European Union, L 80, pp. 22–28. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32002R0535&qid=1442225382302&from=EN
EC.
(2006) ‘Commission Decision 2006/169/EC of 21 February 2006 amending
Decision 93/52/EEC as regards the declaration that Poland and certain provinces
or regions of Italy are free of brucellosis (B. melitensis) and Decision
2003/467/EC as regards the declaration that certain provinces or regions of
Italy are free of bovine tuberculosis, bovine brucellosis and enzootic bovine leucosis’, The
Official Journal of the European Union, L 57, pp. 35–40. Available
at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EL/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32006D0169&from=EN
EC. (2009) ‘Commission
Decision 2009/600/EC of 5 August 2009 amending Decision 2003/467/EC as regards
the declaration that certain Member States and regions thereof are officially
free of bovine brucellosis’, The Official Journal of the European
Union, L 204, pp. 39–42. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32009D0600&qid=1442225134857&from=EN
EFSA. (2007) ‘Scientific
Opinion of the Panel on Biological Hazard (BIOHAZ) on monitoring and
identification of human enteropathogenic Yersinia spp.’, The
EFSA Journal, 595, pp. 1–30. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2007.595
EFSA. (2009) ‘Scientific
Opinion of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) on a request from the
Commission on porcine brucellosis (Brucella suis)’, The EFSA
Journal, 1144, pp. 1–112. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1144
EFSA and ECDC. (2013) ‘The
European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic
agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2011’, The EFSA Journal, 3129,
pp. 1–250. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3129
Franco, M. P., Mulder, M.,
Gilman, R. H. and Smits, H. L. (2007) ‘Human brucellosis’, The
Lancet Infectious Diseases, 7(12), pp. 775–786. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(07)70286-4
Garin-Bastuji, B., Hars,
J., Calvez, D., Thiebaud, M., Cau, C., Sartor, C. and Artois, M. (2000)
Brucellosis in domestic pigs and wild boars due to Brucella suis biovar 2 in
France. In: Brucellosis 2000: proceedings of conference, September 7–9,
Nimes, France, pp. 44
Godfroid, J., Cloeckaert,
A., Liautard, J.‑P., Kohler, S., Fretin, D., Walravens, K., Garin‑Bastuji, B. and Letesson,
J.‑J. (2005) ‘From the discovery of the Malta fever’s
agent to the discovery of a marine mammal reservoir, brucellosis has
continuously been a re‑emerging zoonosis’, Veterinary
Research, 36(3), pp. 313–326. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/vetres:2005003
Gyuranecz, M., Erdelyi,
K., Makrai, L., Fodor, L., Szepe, B., Meszaros, A. R., Dan, A., Dencso, L.,
Fassang, E. and Szeredi, L. (2011) ‘Brucellosis of the European brown
hare (Lepus europaeus)’, Journal of Comparative Pathology,
145(1), pp. 1–5. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcpa.2010.11.013
Hubalek, Z., Treml, F., Juřicova,
Z., Huňady, M., Halouzka, J., Janik, V. and Bill, D. (2002) ‘Serological
survey of the wild boar (Sus scrofa) for tularaemia and brucellosis in
South Moravia, Czech Republic’, Veterinary Medicine (Prague)
[Veterinarni Medicina (Praha)], 47(2–3), pp. 60–66. Available
at: http://vri.cz/docs/vetmed/47-3-60.pdf
Jimenez de Bagues, M. P.,
de Martino, A., Quintana, J. F., Alcaraz, A. and Pardo, J. (2011) ‘Course
of infection with the emergent pathogen Brucella microti in
immunocompromised mice’, Infection and Immunity, 79(10), pp. 3934–3939.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/iai.05542-11
Kautzsch, S., Seyfarth,
D., Schone, R. and Stehmann, R. (1995) ‘An outbreak of brucellosis in
pigs and conclusions derived on the epidemiology of this animal disease’,
Berliner und Munchener tierarztliche Wochenschrift, 108(6), pp. 201–205
Królak, M. and
Stryszak, A. (1979) Standard technique of 2-mercaptoethanol test in
diagnosis of animal brucellosis [Standardowa technika odczynu z
2-merkaptoetanolem (OME) w rozpoznawaniu brucelozy zwierząt].
Puławy: PIWet. [in Polish]
Le Flèche, P.,
Jacques, I., Grayon, M., Al Dahouk, S., Bouchon, P., Denoeud, F., Nöckler,
K., Neubauer, H., Guilloteau, L. A. and Vergnaud, G. (2006) ‘Evaluating
and selection of tandem repeat loci for Brucella MLVA typing assay’,
[Online] BMC Microbiology, 6(9), pp. 1–14. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-6-9
Lopez‑Goni, I.,
Garcia‑Yoldi, D., Marin, C. M., de Miguel, M. J., Munoz, P. M., Blasco,
J. M., Jacques, I., Grayon, M., Cloeckaert, A., Ferreira, A. C., Cardoso, R.,
Correa de Sa, M. I., Walravens, K., Albert, D. and Garin-Bastuji, B. (2008)
‘Evaluation of a multiplex PCR assay (Bruce-ladder) for molecular typing
of all Brucella species, including the vaccine strains’, Journal
of Clinical Microbiology, 46(10), pp. 3484–3487. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00837-08
OIE. (2012) Manual of
diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals (mammals, birds and bees).
Vol. 1–2. 7th ed. Paris: OIE. ISBN 978-92-9044-878-5
Paton, N. I., Tee, N. W.‑S.,
Vu, C. K.‑F. and Teo, T.‑P. (2001) ‘Visceral abscesses due to
Brucella suis infection in a retired pig farmer’, Clinical
Infectious Diseases, 32(8), pp. e129–e130. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/319748
Pilaszek, J., Szulowski,
K. and Iwaniak, W. (2000) ‘Epidemiological condition of animal
brucellosis in Poland’ [Sytuacja epidemiologiczna brucelozy zwierząt
w Polsce], Medycyna Weterynaryjna, 56(6), pp. 363–366. Available
at: http://medycynawet.edu.pl/images/stories/pdf/digital/2000/200006363367.pdf.
[in Polish]
Scholz, H. C., Nockler,
K., Göllner, C., Bahn, P., Vergnaud, G., Tomaso, H., Al Dahouk, S.,
Kämpfer, P., Cloeckaert, A., Maquart, M., Zygmunt, M. S., Whatmore, A. M.,
Pfeffer, M., Huber, B., Busse, H. J. and De, B. K. (2009) ‘Brucella
inopinata sp. nov., isolated from a breast implant infection’, International
Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 60(4), pp.
801–808. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.011148-0
Szulowski, K., Iwaniak,
W., Pilaszek, J., Truszczyński, M. and Chrobocińska, M. (1999)
‘The ELISA for the examination of hare sera for anti-antibodies’, Comparative
Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 22(1), pp. 33–40. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0147-9571(98)00019-8
Szulowski, K., Pilaszek,
J. and Iwaniak, W. (2000) ‘Application of meat juice in diagnosis of
brucellosis in hares and wild boars by ELISA’, The Bulletin of the
Veterinary Institute in Pulawy, 44(1), pp. 45–52
Szulowski, K., Iwaniak,
W., Pilaszek, J. and Murat, J. (2008) Wild boars and hares as reservoirs of
Brucella suis biovar 2 in Poland. In: Proceeding of the Brucellosis 2008
International Research Conference (including the 61st Brucellosis Research
Conference), Septembet, 10–13, 2008, Royal Holloway College, University
of London, UK, pp. 137
Szulowski, K., Iwaniak,
W., Złotnicka, J., Weiner, M., Zaręba, Z. and Czępińska, H.
(2011) ‘International trade — a potential source of brucellosis in
pigs’, Medycyna Weterynaryjna, 67(1), pp. 64–66. Available
at: http://medycynawet.edu.pl/images/stories/pdf/pdf2011/012011/201101064066.pdf.
[in Polish]
Szulowski, K., Iwaniak,
W., Weiner, M., Złotnicka, J., Szymajda, M., Zaręba, Z. and
Czępińska, M. (2012) ‘Diagnosis and epidemiological condition
of bovine brucellosis in Poland’ [Diagnostyka I sytuacja epidemiologiczna
brucelozy bydła w Polsce], Medycyna Weterynaryjna, 68(2), pp.
110–113. Available at: http://medycynawet.edu.pl/images/stories/pdf/pdf2012/022012/201202110113.pdf.
[in Polish]
Teyssou, R., Morvan, J.,
Leleu, J. P., Roumegou, P., Goullin, B. and Carteron, B.
(1989) ‘About a case of human brucellosis due to Brucella suis biovar
2’ [A propos d’un cas de brucellose humaine a Brucella suis biovar
2], Medecine et Maladies Infectieuses, 19(3), pp. 160–161. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0399-077x(89)80221-5.
[in French]
Weiner,
M., Kubajka, M., Szulowski, K., Iwaniak, W., Krajewska, M. and Lipiec, M. (2014)
‘Genotypic virulence markers of Yersinia enterocolitica O:9
isolated from pigs and wild boars serologically positive and negative for
brucellosis’, The Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy,
58(4), pp. 541–545. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/bvip-2014-0083
Wiśniowski, J.,
Królak, M. and Drożdżyńska, M. (1978) Standard
technique of anti-globulin test in diagnosis of bovine brucellosis.
Puławy, Poland: NVRI. [in Polish]