Issue 4
Journal for Veterinary Medicine, Biotechnology and Biosafety
Volume
2, Issue 4, December 2016, Pages 30–32
ISSN 2411-3174 (print version) ISSN 2411-0388
(online version)
BACTERIAL BIOFILMS FORMATION
OF CATTLE MASTITIS PATHOGENS
Kukhtyn
M. D. 1 , Kovalenko V. L. 2 ,
Horyuk Yu. V. 2 , Horyuk V. V. 3
, Stravskyy Ya. S. 2
1 Ternopil Ivan Pul’uj National
Technical University, Ternopil, Ukraine
2 Institute of Veterinary Medicine of the
NAAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine, е-mail: goruky@mail.ru
3 Podilskiy State Agrarian-Engineering
University, Kamyanets-Podilskyi, Ukraine
Download
PDF (print version)
Citation for print version: Kukhtyn, M. D., Kovalenko, V. L., Horyuk, Yu.
V., Horyuk, V. V. and Stravskyy, Ya. S. (2016) ‘Bacterial biofilms
formation of Cattle mastitis pathogens’, Journal for Veterinary Medicine, Biotechnology and Biosafety, 2(4),
pp. 30–32.
Download
PDF (online version)
Citation for online version: Kukhtyn, M. D., Kovalenko, V. L., Horyuk, Yu.
V., Horyuk, V. V. and Stravskyy, Ya. S. (2016) ‘Bacterial biofilms
formation of Cattle mastitis pathogens’, Journal for Veterinary Medicine, Biotechnology and Biosafety.
[Online] 2(4), pp. 30–32. Available at: http://jvmbbs.kharkov.ua/archive/2016/volume2/issue4/oJVMBBS_2016024_030-032.pdf
Summary. The
results of the microbial biofilms formation by subclinical and clinical forms
of cattle mastitis agents were presented. It was
determined, those in cattle with subclinical form of mastitis 2.5 times more
strains of Staphylococcus aureus were allocated. It is occurred,
that biofilm density compared to the clinical form of mastitis demonstrates
such level of range. In addition, staphylococci, which are the causative agents
of cattle mastitis in 1.4–1.7 times more often
form the dense biofilm in comparison to streptococci. The development of the
dense staphylococcal biofilms provides their long-term existence on the teats
skin and in the breast of carrier’s cattle with subclinical form of
mastitis. This helps to transform these animals into the pathogen reservoir.
Anti-epizootic measures should always be conducted
among the animals with clinical form of mastitis for the preventing of
infection process chronic transformation. At a subclinical form of mastitis bacteria are located in biofilm matrix and the
antimicrobial effect will be less effective.
Keywords: biofilms,
cattle, mastitis, Streptococcus, Staphylococcus
References:
Behlau, I. and Gilmore, M. S. (2008) ‘Microbial
biofilms in ophthalmology and infectious disease’, Archives of Ophthalmology,
126(11), pp. 1572–1578. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archopht.126.11.1572
Costerton, J. W., Stewart, P. S. and
Greenberg, E. P. (1999) ‘Bacterial biofilms: A common
cause of persistent infections’, Science, 284(5418),
pp. 1318–1322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5418.1318
Davies, D. G., Parsek, M. R.,
Pearson, J. P., Iglewski, B. H., Costerton, J. T.
and Greenberg, E. P. (1998) ‘The involvement of cell-to-cell
signals in the development of a bacterial biofilm’, Science,
280(5361), pp. 295–298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5361.295
Deutz, A. and Obritzhauser, W. (2003) Eutergesundheit und
Milchqualität: Krankheiten erkennen, vorbeugen, behandeln, Stocker.
ISBN 9783702009878. [in German]
Donlan, R. M. and Costerton, J. W. (2002)
‘Biofilms: Survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms’,
Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 15(2), pp. 167–193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/cmr.15.2.167-193.2002
Flemming, H.-C. and Wingender, J.
(2010) ‘The biofilm matrix’, Nature Reviews Microbiology,
8(9), pp. 623–633. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2415
Gilbert, P., Das, J. and Foley, I. (1997) ‘Biofilm
susceptibility to antimicrobials’, Advances in Dental Research, 11(1), pp. 160–167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08959374970110010701
Kukhtyn, M. D. (2004) Veterinary and sanitary evaluation of
cow’s milk on the content of Staphylococcus aureus [Veterynarno-sanitarna
otsinka moloka koroviachoho nezbyranoho za vmistom zolotystoho stafilokoku].
The dissertation thesis for the scientific degree of the candidate of veterinary sciences. Lviv: Lviv
National Academy of Veterinary Medicine named after S. Z. Gzhytskyj.
[in Ukrainian]
Lewis, K. (2000) ‘Programmed death in bacteria’, Microbiology
and Molecular Biology Reviews, 64(3), pp. 503–514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.64.3.503-514.2000
Mah, T.-F. C. and O’Toole, G. A. (2001)
‘Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents’, Trends
in Microbiology, 9(1), pp. 34–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0966-842x(00)01913-2
Stepanović, S., Vuković, D., Dakić, I.,
Savić, B. and Švabić-Vlahović, M. (2000)
‘A modified microtiter-plate test for quantification of
staphylococcal biofilm formation’, Journal of Microbiological Methods,
40(2), pp. 175–179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0167-7012(00)00122-6
Stewart, P. S. and Costerton, J. W. (2001)
‘Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms’, The Lancet,
358(9276), pp. 135–138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05321-1
Stoodley, P., deBeer, D. and Lewandowski, Z. (1994)
‘Liquid flow in biofilm systems’, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 60(8),
pp. 2711–2716. Available at: http://aem.asm.org/content/60/8/2711.full.pdf