Issue 4

Journal for Veterinary Medicine, Biotechnology and Biosafety

Volume 2, Issue 4, December 2016, Pages 30–32

ISSN 2411-3174 (print version) ISSN 2411-0388 (online version)

BACTERIAL BIOFILMS FORMATION OF CATTLE MASTITIS PATHOGENS

Kukhtyn M. D. 1 , Kovalenko V. L. 2 , Horyuk Yu. V. 2 , Horyuk V. V. 3 , Stravskyy Ya. S. 2

1 Ternopil Ivan Pul’uj National Technical University, Ternopil, Ukraine

2 Institute of Veterinary Medicine of the NAAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine, е-mail: goruky@mail.ru

3 Podilskiy State Agrarian-Engineering University, Kamyanets-Podilskyi, Ukraine

Download PDF (print version)

Citation for print version: Kukhtyn, M. D., Kovalenko, V. L., Horyuk, Yu. V., Horyuk, V. V. and Stravskyy, Ya. S. (2016) ‘Bacterial biofilms formation of Cattle mastitis pathogens’, Journal for Veterinary Medicine, Biotechnology and Biosafety, 2(4), pp. 30–32.

Download PDF (online version)

Citation for online version: Kukhtyn, M. D., Kovalenko, V. L., Horyuk, Yu. V., Horyuk, V. V. and Stravskyy, Ya. S. (2016) ‘Bacterial biofilms formation of Cattle mastitis pathogens’, Journal for Veterinary Medicine, Biotechnology and Biosafety. [Online] 2(4), pp. 30–32. Available at: http://jvmbbs.kharkov.ua/archive/2016/volume2/issue4/oJVMBBS_2016024_030-032.pdf

Summary. The results of the microbial biofilms formation by subclinical and clinical forms of cattle mastitis agents were presented. It was determined, those in cattle with subclinical form of mastitis 2.5 times more strains of Staphylococcus aureus were allocated. It is occurred, that biofilm density compared to the clinical form of mastitis demonstrates such level of range. In addition, staphylococci, which are the causative agents of cattle mastitis in 1.4–1.7 times more often form the dense biofilm in comparison to streptococci. The development of the dense staphylococcal biofilms provides their long-term existence on the teats skin and in the breast of carrier’s cattle with subclinical form of mastitis. This helps to transform these animals into the pathogen reservoir. Anti-epizootic measures should always be conducted among the animals with clinical form of mastitis for the preventing of infection process chronic transformation. At a subclinical form of mastitis bacteria are located in biofilm matrix and the antimicrobial effect will be less effective.

Keywords: biofilms, cattle, mastitis, Streptococcus, Staphylococcus

References:

Behlau, I. and Gilmore, M. S. (2008) ‘Microbial biofilms in ophthalmology and infectious disease’, Archives of Ophthalmology, 126(11), pp. 1572–1578. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archopht.126.11.1572

Costerton, J. W., Stewart, P. S. and Greenberg, E. P. (1999) ‘Bacterial biofilms: A common cause of persistent infections’, Science, 284(5418), pp. 1318–1322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5418.1318

Davies, D. G., Parsek, M. R., Pearson, J. P., Iglewski, B. H., Costerton, J. T. and Greenberg, E. P. (1998) ‘The involvement of cell-to-cell signals in the development of a bacterial biofilm’, Science, 280(5361), pp. 295–298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5361.295

Deutz, A. and Obritzhauser, W. (2003) Eutergesundheit und Milchqualität: Krankheiten erkennen, vorbeugen, behandeln, Stocker. ISBN 9783702009878. [in German]

Donlan, R. M. and Costerton, J. W. (2002) ‘Biofilms: Survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms’, Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 15(2), pp. 167–193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/cmr.15.2.167-193.2002

Flemming, H.-C. and Wingender, J. (2010) ‘The biofilm matrix’, Nature Reviews Microbiology, 8(9), pp. 623–633. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2415

Gilbert, P., Das, J. and Foley, I. (1997) ‘Biofilm susceptibility to antimicrobials’, Advances in Dental Research, 11(1), pp. 160–167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08959374970110010701

Kukhtyn, M. D. (2004) Veterinary and sanitary evaluation of cow’s milk on the content of Staphylococcus aureus [Veterynarno-sanitarna otsinka moloka koroviachoho nezbyranoho za vmistom zolotystoho stafilokoku]. The dissertation thesis for the scientific degree of the candidate of veterinary sciences. Lviv: Lviv National Academy of Veterinary Medicine named after S. Z. Gzhytskyj. [in Ukrainian]

Lewis, K. (2000) ‘Programmed death in bacteria’, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 64(3), pp. 503–514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.64.3.503-514.2000

Mah, T.-F. C. and O’Toole, G. A. (2001) ‘Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents’, Trends in Microbiology, 9(1), pp. 34–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0966-842x(00)01913-2

Stepanović, S., Vuković, D., Dakić, I., Savić, B. and Švabić-Vlahović, M. (2000) ‘A modified microtiter-plate test for quantification of staphylococcal biofilm formation’, Journal of Microbiological Methods, 40(2), pp. 175–179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0167-7012(00)00122-6

Stewart, P. S. and Costerton, J. W. (2001) ‘Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms’, The Lancet, 358(9276), pp. 135–138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05321-1

Stoodley, P., deBeer, D. and Lewandowski, Z. (1994) ‘Liquid flow in biofilm systems’, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 60(8), pp. 2711–2716. Available at: http://aem.asm.org/content/60/8/2711.full.pdf