Issue 3
Journal for Veterinary Medicine, Biotechnology and Biosafety
Volume
4, Issue 3, September 2018, Pages 17–19
ISSN 2411-3174 (print version) ISSN 2411-0388
(online version)
ELISA DIAGNOSTIC OF METAPNEUMOVIRUS AND REOVIRUS
INFECTIONS IN POULTRY
Ivleva O. V. 1, Nalyvaiko L. I. 1, Ryabinin S. V. 2
1 Luhansk National
Agrarian University, Kharkiv, Ukraine, e-mail: sauce1908@gmail.com
2 State Research Station of Poultry Industry of
the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine, e-mail:
ryabinin.sv1979@gmail.com
Download
PDF (print version)
Citation for print version: Ivleva, O. V.,
Nalyvaiko, L. I. and Ryabinin, S. V.
(2018) ‘ELISA diagnostic of Metapneumovirus and
Reovirus infections in poultry’, Journal for Veterinary Medicine, Biotechnology and
Biosafety, 4(3), pp. 17–19.
Download
PDF (online version)
Citation for online version: Ivleva, O. V.,
Nalyvaiko, L. I. and Ryabinin, S. V.
(2018) ‘ELISA diagnostic of Metapneumovirus and
Reovirus infections in poultry’, Journal for Veterinary Medicine, Biotechnology and
Biosafety. [Online] 4(3), pp. 17–19. Available at:
http://jvmbbs.kharkov.ua/archive/2018/volume4/issue3/oJVMBBS_2018043_017-019.pdf
Summary. The import of high-yielding poultry breeds
has caused the proliferation of viral diseases which
previously did not occur at Ukrainian poultry enterprises, such as avian metapneumovirus (AMPV) and avian reovirus (ARV) infections. Most pathogens cause
immunosuppression in poultry (including ARV infection) and are frequently
diagnosed as co‑infections with other infectious agents
which are capable of causing pathological changes in poultry (especially
if aided by stress). AMPV and ARV co‑infection cannot be excluded; these diseases are manifested in
respiratory and intestinal disorders, their subclinical, latent, and associated
forms present a challenge for laboratory diagnostic as well as for the
implementation of prophylactic measures. The objective of the present work was
to conduct the epizootological survey of AMPV and ARV infections incidence at poultry enterprises of
different forms of property and to produce an antigen suitable for the
development of an ELISA test-system for the determination of antibodies against
AMPV in blood serums of turkeys and hens. The pathological
material used in the experiments (heads, tracheas, and lungs from ill or
deceased poultry) for the isolation of pneumovirus was collected from 60‑day‑old turkeys in 2009.
The pathological material for virology research was preserved at
– 20 °С. Serology and virology research was conducted using standard methods. AMPV
and ARV incidence monitoring was conducted at poultry enterprises of Kharkiv
region among turkeys of ‘Big‑6’ and ‘Big‑8’
breeds imported from Germany and Hungary (aged 4–480 days), among
turkeys of ‘Large White’ breed (aged 70 days), and hens of
‘Birkivska Barvysta’
and ‘Hisex Brown’ (aged 250 and
180 days correspondingly). On average, 78.0% of the examined turkeys with
antibody titers 1:3,776–1:27,869, 100% of the ‘Birkivska
Barvysta” hens with antibody titers
1:4,997–1:10,414 and 0% of the ‘Hisex
Brown’ hens were AMPV‑positive. No hens
were ARV‑positive. At the Luhansk National
Agrarian University (Kharkiv) the development of a
domestic ELISA test-system for the diagnostic of AMPV
in turkeys and hens is carried out.
Keywords: epizootiology, metapneumovirus, reovirus, infection, poultry, purification and
concentration, ELISA
References:
Abdil’aziz, F. (1990) ‘Study of the biological properties of reoviruses isolated from chickens and turkeys’ [Izuchenie biologicheskikh svoystv reovirusov, vydelennykh ot
kur i indeek],
Veterinary Medicine [Veterinariya:
respublikanskiy mezhvedomstvennyy
tematicheskiy nauchnyy sbornik], 65, pp. 104–107. [in Russian]
Aliev, A. S.
(2005) ‘Avian reovirus infection’ [Reovirusnaya infektsiya ptits], Livestock
Veterinary Medicine [Veterinariya sel’skokhozyaystvennykh
zhivotnykh], 12, pp. 28–32. [in Russian]
Borisova, I. A.
and Starov, S. K. (2006) ‘Avian pneumovirus infection’ [Pnevmovirusnaya
infektsiya ptits]. Proceedings of the Federal Centre for Animal
Health [Trudy Federal’nogo tsentra
okhrany zdorov’ya zhivotnykh], 4,
pp. 281–296. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=14454020. [in
Russian]
German, I. V. and German, V. V. (2002) ‘The
study of the virulent properties of avireoviruses
isolated from laying hens, broilers and goslings’ [Vyvchennia
virulentnykh vlastyvostei avireovirusiv, izolovanykh vid kurei-nesuchok, broileriv ta huseniat], Veterinary
Medicine of Ukraine [Veterynarna medytsyna
Ukrainy], 7,
pp. 37–38. [in Ukrainian]
Nalyvaiko, L. I.,
Bezrukava, I. Yu.,
Nikolaenko, Yu. Yu., Bondarenko, A. L.
and Riabeka, D. A. (2011) ‘Epizootiological monitoring of avian metapneumovirus
infection in poultry farms in Ukraine’ [Epizootolohichnyi
monitorynh metapnevmovirusnoi
infektsii u ptakhivnychykh hospodarstvakh Ukrainy], Veterinary Medicine of Ukraine [Veterynarna medytsyna Ukrainy], 1, pp. 9–11. [in
Ukrainian]
Reed, L. J. and Muench, H.
(1938) ‘A simple method of estimating fifty per cent endpoints’, American Journal of Hygiene, 27(3),
pp. 493–497. Available at: http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/content/27/3/493.full.pdf
Riabinin, S. V.,
Nikolaenko, Yu. Yu. and
Nalyvaiko, L. I. (2012)
‘Tenosynovitis of hens: diagnostic and prevention’ [Tenosynovit kurei: diahnostyka ta profilaktyka], Veterinary Medicine of Ukraine [Veterynarna medytsyna Ukrainy], 10, pp. 17–20. [in
Ukrainian]