Journal for Veterinary Medicine, Biotechnology and Biosafety
Volume
12, Issue 2, May 2026, Pages 41–46
ISSN 2411-3174 (print version) ISSN 2411-0388
(online version)
JUSTIFICATION
FOR THE EFFICACY OF THE BIOCIDE ‘KREZONID’
IN CONTROLLING BACTERIAL INFECTIONS
Kovalenko V. L. 1, 2, Ihnatieva T. M. 2, 5, Ponomariova S. А. 3,
Popov D. О. 4,
Stupak О. М. 1
1 State Research
Institute for Laboratory Diagnostics and Veterinary and Sanitary Expertise,
Kyiv, Ukraine, e-mail: kovalenkodoktor@gmail.com
2 Institute of
Veterinary Medicine of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine,
Kyiv, Ukraine
3 State Scientific-Research Control Institute of Veterinary Medicinal Products
and Feed Additives, Lviv, Ukraine
4 Group of Companies ‘Sanfort’, Kyiv,
Ukraine
5 State Biotechnological University, Kharkiv,
Ukraine
Download
PDF (print version)
Citation for print version: Kovalenko, V. L.,
Ihnatieva, T. M., Ponomariova, S. А.,
Popov, D. О. and Stupak, О. М. (2026)
‘Justification for the
efficacy of the biocide ‘Krezonid’ in controlling bacterial infections’, Journal for Veterinary Medicine, Biotechnology and
Biosafety, 12(2), pp. 41–46.
Download
PDF (online version)
Citation for online version: Kovalenko, V. L.,
Ihnatieva, T. M., Ponomariova, S. А.,
Popov, D. О. and Stupak, О. М. (2026)
‘Justification for the
efficacy of the biocide ‘Krezonid’ in controlling bacterial infections’, Journal for Veterinary Medicine, Biotechnology and
Biosafety, 12(2), pp. 41–46. DOI: 10.36016/JVMBBS-2026-12-2-6.
Summary. The
study aimed to experimentally substantiate the bactericidal activity of the biocidal agent ‘Krezonid’
(based on meta-cresol, lactic acid, and a quaternary ammonium compound) and to
determine the minimum effective regimens for its use to completely inactivate
Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria, which are important in
veterinary medicine and poultry farming, while simultaneously verifying the
absence of a bacteriostatic effect. The study was conducted using the in vitro
suspension method in accordance with the requirements of European standards
(EN 1040:2005, EN 1656:2019, EN 12353:2021) and methodological
recommendations for veterinary disinfectants. Standard strains of Staphylococcus
aureus ATCC 6538 and Pseudomonas
aeruginosa ATCC 15442
were used as test microorganisms. Working concentrations of the drug of 0.1%,
0.3%, 0.5%, and 1.0% were tested at exposure times of 10, 20, and
30 minutes. After contact, the samples were rinsed three times with
saline, and cultures were inoculated onto tryptone-soy
agar (to assess bactericidal activity) and into tryptone-soy
broth with repeated re-inoculations over 72 hours (to rule out bacteriostasis). The results showed a clear dependence of
efficacy on concentration and exposure time. A concentration of 0.1% did not
ensure complete inactivation even after 30 minutes. At 0.3%, complete
inactivation was achieved inconsistently, with occasional residual growth. A
stable and reproducible bactericidal effect against both test cultures was
observed at a concentration of 0.5% after just 20 minutes of exposure, and
at 30 minutes in 100% of replicates. The maximum rate of action was noted
at 1.0% — destruction of microorganisms after 10 minutes of
contact. No bacteriostatic effect was observed under effective conditions:
growth did not resume after repeated inoculations. The data obtained confirm
the pronounced bactericidal (rather than bacteriostatic) activity of ‘Krezonid’ against Gram-positive and Gram-negative
bacteria. The recommended minimum concentration is 0.5% for a 30‑minute
exposure (or 20 minutes under stable conditions); a 1.0% concentration for
10 minutes is optimal for rapid disinfection. The results allow us to
recommend the product for use in veterinary and sanitary measures at industrial
livestock and poultry facilities, provided that appropriate protocols are
followed
Keywords: bactericidal activity,
bacteriostatic effect, Staphylococcus aureus,
Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
disinfection
References:
Curran, E. T., Wilkinson, M.
and Bradley, T. (2019) ‘Chemical disinfectants: controversies
regarding their use in low risk healthcare environments (part 1)’, Journal
of Infection Prevention, 20(2), pp. 76–82. doi: 10.1177/1757177419828139.
Harkavenko, T. O., Kovalenko, V. L.,
Horbatiuk, O. I., Pinchuk, N. H.,
Kozytska, T. H., Harkavenko, V. M.
and Ordynska, D. O. (2020) Methodical Recommendations for Determining
the Bactericidal Activity and Controlling the Absence of Bacteriostatic Effect
of Disinfectants [Metodychni rekomendatsii
z vyznachennia bakteritsydnoi
aktyvnosti ta kontroliu vidsutnosti bakteriostatichnoho efektu dezinfikuiuchykh zasobiv]. Kyiv: DNDILDZVSE,
2020. [in Ukrainian].
Koti, K., Rodas-Gonzalez, A.,
Nadon, C., McAllister, T., Yang, X.
and Narváez-Bravo, C. (2024)
‘Evaluating disinfectant efficacy on mixed biofilms comprising Shiga
toxigenic Escherichia coli, lactic acid bacteria, and spoilage
microorganisms’, Frontiers in Microbiology, 15, p. 1360645. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1360645.
Kovalenko, V. L. and Nedosiekov, V. V.
(eds.) (2011) Methodological Approaches
to the Control of Disinfectants for Veterinary Medicine [Metodychni
pidkhody shchodo kontroliu dezinfikuiuchykh zasobiv dlia veterynarnoi
medytsyny]. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
Kovalenko, V. L., Zasiekin, D. A.,
Nedosiekov, V. V., Nychyk, S. A.
and Hnatenko, A. V. (2013) Development and Control of Disinfectant [Rozrobka i kontrol dezinfikuiuchoho zasobu].
Kyiv: Interservis. ISBN
978966245307. [in Ukrainian].
Kovalenko, V. L., Kovalenko, P. L.,
Ponomarenko, G. V., Kukhtyn, M. D.,
Midyk, S. V., Horiuk, Yu. V.
and Garkavenko, V. M. (2018) ‘Changes
in lipid composition of Escherichia coli
and Staphylococcus areus
cells under the influence of disinfectants Barez®,
Biochlor® and Geocide®’,
Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 8(1), pp. 547–550. doi: 10.15421/2018_248.
Melo, E. F., McElreath, J. S.,
Wilson, J. L., Lara, L. J. C., Cox, N. A.
and Jordan, B. J. (2020) ‘Effects of a dry hydrogen peroxide
disinfection system used in an egg cooler on hatchability and chick
quality’, Poultry Science, 99(11),
pp. 5487–5490. doi:
10.1016/j.psj.2020.05.050.
Paliy, A. P., Rodionova, K. O.,
Braginec, M. V., Paliy, A. P.
and Nalivayko, L. I. (2018) ‘Sanitary-hygienic
evaluation of meat processing enterprises productions and their sanation’, Ukrainian
Journal of Ecology, 8(2), pp. 81‒88. Available at: https://www.ujecology.com/articles/sanitaryhygienic-evaluation-of-meat-processing-enterprises-productions-and-their-sanation.pdf.
Paliy, A. P., Zavgorodniy, A. I.,
Stegniy, B. T. and Palii, A. P.
(2020) Scientific and Methodological Grounds for Controlling the Development
and Use of Disinfectants [Naukovo-metodychni osnovy kontroliu rozrobky ta zastosuvannia zasobiv dezinfektsii]. Kharkiv: Miskdruk. doi: 10.36016/VB-2020-1.
[in Ukrainian].
Ponomarenko, G. V., Kovalenko, V. L.,
Kukhtyn, M. D., Paliy, A. P.,
Bodnar, O. O., Rebenko, H. I.,
Kozytska, T. G., Makarevich, T. V.,
Ponomarenko, O. V. and Palii, A. P.
(2020) ‘Evaluation of acute toxicity of the ‘Orgasept’
disinfectant’, Ukrainian Journal of
Ecology, 10(4), pp. 273–278. Available at: https://www.ujecology.com/articles/evaluation-of-acute-toxicity-of-the-orgasept-disinfectant.pdf.
Ponomarenko, G. V., Kovalenko, V. L.,
Balatskiy, Y. O., Ponomarenko, O. V.,
Paliy, A. P. and Shulyak, S. V.
(2021) ‘Bactericidal efficiency of preparation based on essential oils
used in aerosol disinfection in the presence of poultry’, Regulatory
Mechanisms in Biosystems, 12(4),
pp. 635–641. doi:
10.15421/022187.
Rutala, W. A. and Weber, D. J.
(2016) ‘Disinfection, sterilization, and antisepsis: an overview’, American
Journal of Infection Control, 44(5), p. e1‒e6.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.10.038.
Scicchitano, D., Leuzzi, D.,
Babbi, G., Palladino, G.,
Turroni, S., Laczny, C. C.,
Wilmes, P., Correa, F., Leekitcharoenphon, P.,
Savojardo, C., Luise, D.,
Martelli, P., Trevisi, P.,
Aarestrup, F. M., Candela, M. and Rampelli, S. (2024) ‘Dispersion of antimicrobial
resistant bacteria in pig farms and in the surrounding environment’, Animal
Microbiome, 6(1), p. 17. doi:
10.1186/s42523-024-00305-8.
SE ‘UkrNDNC’
(State Enterprise ‘Ukrainian Research and Training Center of
Standardization, Certification and Quality Problems’) (2022a) DSTU EN 1040:2022
Chemical Disinfectants and Antiseptics — Quantitative Suspension
Test for the Evaluation of Basic Bactericidal Activity of Chemical
Disinfectants and Antiseptics — Test Method and Requirements (Phase 1)
(EN 1040:2005, IDT). Kyiv: SE ‘UkrNDNC’.
Available at: https://fnd-store.uas.gov.ua/documents/52709.
SE ‘UkrNDNC’
(State Enterprise ‘Ukrainian Research and Training Center of
Standardization, Certification and Quality Problems’) (2022b) DSTU EN 1656:2022
Chemical Disinfectants and Antiseptics — Quantitative Suspension
Test for the Evaluation of Bactericidal Activity of Chemical Disinfectants and
Antiseptics Used in the Veterinary Area — Test Method and
Requirements (Phase 2, Step 1) (EN 1656:2019, IDT). Kyiv:
SE ‘UkrNDNC’. Available at: https://fnd-store.uas.gov.ua/documents/56984.
SE ‘UkrNDNC’
(State Enterprise ‘Ukrainian Research and Training Center of Standardization,
Certification and Quality Problems’) (2022c) DSTU EN 12353:2022 Chemical
Disinfectants and Antiseptics — Preservation of Test Organisms Used
for the Determination of Bactericidal (Including Legionella), Mycobactericidal, Sporicidal,
Fungicidal and Virucidal (Including Bacteriophages)
Activity (EN 12353:2021, IDT). Kyiv: SE ‘UkrNDNC’. Available at: https://fnd-store.uas.gov.ua/documents/53337.
Tarka, P. and Nitsch-Osuch, A.
(2021) ‘Evaluating the virucidal activity of
disinfectants according to European Union standards’, Viruses,
13(4), p. 534. doi: 10.3390/v13040534.
Van Haute, S., López-Gálvez, F.,
Gómez-López, V. M., Eriksson, M.,
Devlieghere, F., Allende, A. and Sampers, I. (2015) ‘Methodology for modeling the
disinfection efficiency of fresh-cut leafy vegetables wash water applied on peracetic acid combined with lactic acid’, International
Journal of Food Microbiology, 208, pp. 102–113. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.05.020.
Wales, A. D.,
Gosling, R. J., Bare, H. L. and Davies, R. H.
(2021) ‘Disinfectant testing for veterinary and agricultural
applications: A review’, Zoonoses and
Public Health, 68(5), pp. 361–375. doi: 10.1111/zph.12830.
Wlazlo, L., Drabik, K.,
Al-Shammari, K. I. A., Batkowska, J., Nowakowicz-Debek, B.
and Gryzińska, M. (2020) ‘Use of
reactive oxygen species (ozone, hydrogen peroxide) for disinfection of hatching
eggs’, Poultry Science, 99(5), pp. 2478–2484. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2019.12.039.
